論文種別 原著(症例報告除く)
言語種別 英語
査読の有無 その他(不明)
表題 P2Y12 Reaction Units With Prasugrel in Acute Large Artery Atherosclerosis and Transient Ischemic Attack: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study, ACUTE-PRAS.
掲載誌名 正式名:Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society
略  称:Circ J
ISSNコード:13474820/13469843
掲載区分国外
巻・号・頁 pp.Online ahead of print
著者・共著者 Shigeru Fujimoto, Yasuyuki Iguchi, Hiroshi Yamagami, Masatoshi Koga, Ryo Itabashi, Yusuke Yakushiji, Kazuma Kowata, Naoto Kimura, Yuka Terasawa, Takahiro Shimizu, Yuichi Miyazaki, Koichi Oki, Osamu Masuo, Hideki Matsuoka, Shuji Arakawa, Toshihiro Ueda, Ryota Tanaka, Wataru Hashimoto, Satoru Abe, Go Kato, Taketoshi Furugori, Kazumi Kimura,
発行年月 2025/05
概要 BACKGROUND:The antiplatelet effect of prasugrel for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remains unclear. This study compared platelet reactivity between prasugrel and clopidogrel, considering cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19 (CYP2C19) gene polymorphisms (extensive metabolizers [EM], intermediate metabolizers [IM], and poor metabolizers [PM]), in patients with acute large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or high-risk TIA.METHODS AND RESULTS:In this multicenter open-label randomized controlled study, patients with acute LAA or high-risk TIA received prasugrel or clopidogrel with aspirin. The primary endpoint was platelet reaction units (PRU) 5 days after the start of drug administration, stratified according to CYP2C19 polymorphism. In all, 176 patients participated (88 in each group). Compared with the clopidogrel group, PRU on Day 5 in the prasugrel group were significantly lower in the overall population (adjusted mean 136.0 vs. 169.9; estimated difference -33.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] -49.0, -18.8), EM group (118.5 vs. 144.8; estimated difference -26.2; 95% CI -48.0, -4.4), and IM group (140.3 vs. 173.1; estimated difference -32.8; 95% CI -56.6, -9.0), and tended to be lower in the PM group (164.7 vs. 196.2; estimated difference -31.6; 95% CI -68.3, 5.1). The prevalence of new infarct lesions was comparable between the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups, as was the incidence of adverse events (30.7% vs. 26.1%, respectively) and bleeding events up to Day 5 of administration.CONCLUSIONS:In patients with acute LAA or high-risk TIA, prasugrel resulted in stable inhibition of platelet aggregation 5 days after starting drug administration compared with clopidogrel, regardless of CYP2C19 polymorphisms.
DOI 10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0949
PMID 40383626