論文種別 原著(症例報告除く)
言語種別 英語
査読の有無 その他(不明)
表題 Comparative Analysis of Fusion and Decompression Surgery in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Multicenter Observational Study of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (Tc-MEP).
掲載誌名 正式名:Spine
略  称:Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
ISSNコード:15281159/03622436
掲載区分国外
巻・号・頁 pp.Online ahead of print
著者・共著者 Masahiro Funaba, Tsukasa Kanchiku, Go Yoshida, Hiroki Ushirozako, Kenta Kurosu, Naoki Segi, Muneharu Ando, Shigenori Kawabata, Kei Yamada, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Shinichirou Taniguchi, Hideki Shigematsu, Nobuaki Tadokoro, Masahito Takahashi, Naoya Yamamoto, Kanichiro Wada, Akimasa Yasuda, Jun Hashimoto, Shinji Morito, Shoji Seki, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi, Tsunenori Takatani, Yasushi Fujiwara, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Shiro Imagama, Takashi Sakai, Katsushi Takeshita
発行年月 2025/07
概要 STUDY DESIGN:A multicenter observational study.OBJECTIVE:To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance and clinical value of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) in predicting postoperative paralysis in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), specifically on stratifying true-positive alerts in fusion versus decompression surgeries.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Tc-MEP monitoring is widely used to detect intraoperative motor deficits, but its accuracy and predictive value in different surgical approaches remain unclear.METHODS:A total of 3,813 patients with DCM who underwent cervical spine surgery were analyzed. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as a ≥70% reduction in amplitude. Postoperative paralysis was categorized as upper limb palsy or lower limb palsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of Tc-MEP alerts were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors of true-positive alerts.RESULTS:Postoperative motor paralysis occurred in 1.36% (52/3,778) of cases. The Tc-MEP sensitivity was 57.7%, specificity 93.2%, PPV 10.6%, and NPV 99.4%. Fusion surgery had a significantly higher postoperative paralysis rate (3.7% in posterior decompression with fusion [PDF] vs. 0.8% in posterior decompression alone). Fusion surgery was an independent predictor of true-positive alerts (OR = 4.62, 95% CI: 1.69-12.66), while non-attributed alerts were the primary cause of false positives (OR = 0.036, 95% CI: 0.004-0.37).CONCLUSION:Tc-MEP alerts showed higher PPV in fusion surgery, reflecting the greater risk profile in these procedures. However, the consistently high NPV across all surgical approaches supports the broad utility of Tc-MEP in ensuring intraoperative neurological safety. This study provides the first large-scale, stratified analysis of Tc-MEP alert outcomes in fusion versus decompression surgery, offering actionable insights for intraoperative neuromonitoring in complex DCM cases.
DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005455
PMID 40674034