| 論文種別 | 原著(症例報告除く) |
| 言語種別 | 英語 |
| 査読の有無 | 査読あり |
| 表題 | Diagnostic agreement and limitations of the Banff automated system in kidney transplant biopsies. |
| 掲載誌名 | 正式名:Frontiers in nephrology 略 称:Front Nephrol ISSNコード:28130626/28130626 |
| 掲載区分 | 国外 |
| 巻・号・頁 | 5,pp.1645280 |
| 著者・共著者 | Jun Matsushita, Toshihito Hirai, Tomokazu Shimizu, Yu Kijima, Kohei Unagami, Masaaki Yanishi, Hidefumi Kinoshita, Toshio Takagi, Hideki Ishida |
| 発行年月 | 2025/11 |
| 概要 | The Banff classification for renal allograft rejection has evolved over time, increasing in complexity. For non-pathologists conducting retrospective studies, assigning Banff diagnostic categories across different eras presents a significant challenge. The Automated Diagnosis System (ADS) is a publicly available web-based tool designed to standardize Banff category diagnoses based on Banff scoring. We retrospectively evaluated ADS using 1,071 kidney biopsy results from 544 transplant recipients, including 146 ABO-incompatible cases performed at our institution. Overall concordance between ADS and pathologists was 69.8%, with high agreement in non-rejection (97.4%) and rejection (86.3%) cases. Among rejection cases, discrepancies were noted in 27 antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and 22 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases. Discrepancies were frequently observed in AMR following ABO-incompatible transplantation and in chronic TCMR, highlighting challenges in standardizing these categories. Despite these limitations, ADS demonstrated acceptable concordance and potential utility for promoting global standardization in rejection diagnosis. |
| DOI | 10.3389/fneph.2025.1645280 |
| PMID | 41358048 |