| 論文種別 | 原著(症例報告除く) |
| 言語種別 | 英語 |
| 査読の有無 | その他(不明) |
| 表題 | Real-World Comparison of First-Line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab and Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. |
| 掲載誌名 | 正式名：Liver cancer 略 称：Liver Cancer ISSNコード：22351795/16645553 |
| 掲載区分 | 国外 |
| 巻・号・頁 | pp.Online ahead of print |
| 著者・共著者 | Atsushi Hiraoka, Toshifumi Tada, Masashi Hirooka, Kazuya Kariyama, Joji Tani, Masanori Atsukawa, Koichi Takaguchi, Ei Itobayashi, Takashi Nishimura, Kunihiko Tsuji, Toru Ishikawa, Kazuto Tajiri, Hironori Tanaka, Hidenori Toyoda, Chikara Ogawa, Takeshi Hatanaka, Satoru Kakizaki, Kazuhito Kawata, Atsushi Naganuma, Hisashi Kosaka, Tomomitsu Matono, Hidekatsu Kuroda, Yutaka Yata, Hiroki Nishikawa, Michitaka Imai, Tomoko Aoki, Hironori Ochi, Hideyuki Tamai, Shohei Komatsu, Takanori Matsuura, Yoshihide Ueda, Soo Ki Kim, Hideko Ohama, Fujimasa Tada, Shinichiro Nakamura, Yoshiko Nakamura, Osamu Yoshida, Kazuhiro Nouso, Asahiro Morishita, Norio Itokawa, Tomomi Okubo, Taeang Arai, Akemi Tsutsui, Takuya Nagano, Shinya Fukunishi, Kazunari Tanaka, Yuichi Koshiyama, Yuki Kanayama, Hidenao Noritake, Hirayuki Enomoto, Kosuke Matsui, Masaki Kaibori, Jumpei Okamura, Takumi Fukumoto, Yoichi Hiasa, Masatoshi Kudo, Takashi Kumada, , |
| 発行年月 | 2026/04 |
| 概要 | INTRODUCTION:Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen approved in 2020 for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), followed by durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) in 2023. There is very little data available comparing the efficacy and safety of Atez/Bev with those of Dur/Tre. This study aimed to clarify the therapeutic outcomes and safety of Atez/Bev and Dur/Tre.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed patients with uHCC (BCLC-B/C and Child-Pugh class A) treated with Atez/Bev (n = 302) or Dur/Tre (n = 129) as first-line systemic therapy across multiple institutions between 2023 and 2025. A retrospective comparison of the treatment outcomes and safety of Atez/Bev and Dur/Tre was conducted.RESULTS:The objective response rate and disease control rate were comparable between the Atez/Bev and Dur/Tre groups (31.8%/71.9% vs. 28.7%/63.6%, p = 0.570/p = 0.110, respectively). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer with Atez/Bev (9.1 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.002), while OS was comparable (25.6 vs. 22.1 months, p = 0.172). Similar results were shown after adjusting with inverse probability weighting (IPW). Grade 5 immune-related adverse events occurred in 0.3% (n = 1, interstitial pneumonia) of the patients receiving Atez/Bev and 0.8% (n = 1, colitis) of those receiving Dur/Tre. In the Cox hazard analysis adjusted with IPW, Dur/Tre demonstrated a favorable trend in OS (hazard ratio [HR] <0.75) in patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (≥100 ng/mL) (HR 0.72, interaction p = 0.006) or double positive elevation of tumor marker (AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin [≥100 mAU/mL]) (HR 0.66, interaction p = 0.005).CONCLUSION:Although Atez/Bev was associated with a longer PFS, OS did not differ significantly between Atez/Bev and Dur/Tre. This dissociation between PFS and OS may reflect differences in disease biology, treatment sequencing, and post-progression management rather than intrinsic superiority of either regimen. These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment selection and careful consideration of tumor characteristics and hepatic reserve when choosing first-line immunotherapy for uHCC. |
| DOI | 10.1159/000550924 |
| PMID | 42232791 |